Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frumhere


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete - crz crztalk 04:41, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Frumhere
Ad for non-notable social networking site. Fails WP:WEB. Delete. JFW | T@lk  23:50, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. --DLand TALK 00:09, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep if there is an entry for Arab social networking why shouldn't there be an entry for Frum Jewish social networking  This site is also on an accepted list of social networking sites at  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigjoe613 (talk • contribs)
 * comment There is no rule demanding fair and equal time, an article should be decided on it's own merits. Just because there is an Arab networking site already featured that does not give a free pass to a Jewish one.wtfunkymonkey 02:13, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: FWIW, Bigjoe was the article's creator, and also added it to the List of social networking websites. --Czj 04:15, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Delete - the big dating services are frumster and Jdate. This is a small start up.
 * Delete - totally non notable, no sources cited, fails WP:WEB -- wtfunkymonkey 02:13, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't give a s*** - I edited the article a bit for cleanup, but if the original creator can't produce information to meet the requirements of WP:WEB, delete away. I should probably unwatch List of social networking websites so I don't get sucked into these things. Argyriou (talk) 05:23, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletions.  - crz crztalk 21:03, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Wait I've never heard of the site, but I would give it a little time to establish evidence of notability if it can. I would imagine standards for notability among members of a relatively small (but itself notable) community would be somewhat lesser than standards for the general public, but there is a floor. If there's no evidence of notability at all, by all means delete. --Shirahadasha 21:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:WEB and WP:CORP. JoshuaZ 22:58, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. ←Humus sapiens ну? 04:07, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.