Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frysk Puzelwurdboek


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Deleting this one, the sources surely don't help the subject pass GNG. However, WP:REFUND applies if anyone can find the right "type" of sources. Thanks everyone for contributing and assuming good faith! Missvain (talk) 15:54, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Frysk Puzelwurdboek

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can only find one, one-paragraph review of this book (see here). buidhe 13:55, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. buidhe 13:55, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:37, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:37, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:18, 10 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Page creator added two sources. The first source has only two sentences about the subject: "Yn 1992 is it Frysk Puzelwurdboek fan Douwe vander Meulen ferskynd. Dat wurdboek is út soarte ornearre foar puzelders, martrochdat it in soad synonimen jout en ek wurden oarderet neffens rubriken lyk-as fartugen, klean en lichemsdielen is it Puzelwurdboek in tige wolkommeoanfolling op ’e hânwurdboeken fan ’e FA"

The other source also only has two sentences: "In 1992  is  het  Frysk  Puzelwurdboek van Douwe van  der  Meulen  versche-nen.  Dat  woordenboek  is  uiteraard  bedoeld  voor  puzzelaars,  maar  door-dat  het  veel  synoniemen  geeft  en  ook  woorden  ordent  volgens  rubrie-ken  als  vaartuigen, kleding en  lichaamsdelen,  is  het  Puzelwurdboek een  wel-kome  aanvulling op  de  handwoordenboeken  van  de   FA."

These are just passing mentions, not significant coverage in my opinion. <b style="color: White">b</b><b style="color: White">uidh</b><b style="color: White">e</b> 07:17, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Actually, they mean exactly the same thing, the first in Frisian and the second in Dutch. <b style="color: White">b</b><b style="color: White">uidh</b><b style="color: White">e</b> 07:42, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep more references have been made, based on the reliable source coverage. Meets WP:GNG. Kees Swart (talk) 07:39, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
 * All of the significant coverage combined makes three short paragraphs from two sources. Not enough for GNG imo. <b style="color: White">b</b><b style="color: White">uidh</b><b style="color: White">e</b> 07:49, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Two more references/sources are added.Kees Swart (talk) 06:30, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Unless I'm missing something, this looks like passing mention in a reliable source and this is a self-published website (not RS). <b style="color: White">b</b><b style="color: White">uidh</b><b style="color: White">e</b> 06:37, 12 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep Other sources exist, specifically the Netherlands Wikipedia article has fours sources available to verify the article.  scope_creep Talk  12:35, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
 * No, if you check you would see that the four sources are the same ones cited in this article. <b style="color: White">b</b><b style="color: White">uidh</b><b style="color: White">e</b> 13:49, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Regrettably. Wikipedia is not a library catalogue, and this book does note meet GNG. -- Sirfurboy (talk) 17:34, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <small style="color:#999;text-shadow:#D3D3D3 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em">— <big style="color:#ffa439">Coffee //  have a ☕️ //  beans  // 20:57, 17 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.