Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fußball-Bundesliga - August 2006


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Petros471 13:05, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Fußball-Bundesliga - August 2006
Fußball-Bundesliga - September 2006 was recently deleted for being excessive/unencyclopedic, and this should follow. Punkmorten 13:16, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Fußball-Bundesliga - September 2006 AfD Oldelpaso 13:29, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 * This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. Oldelpaso 13:29, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per other AfD. – Elisson • Talk 13:40, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree --shanda 13:49, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep The other AfD was about an empty article with no fixtures (as those are copyrighted). This is about an article with some information and potential, which is verifiable and useful, and should stay. Sam Vimes | Address me 20:24, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Wrong. Nobody mentioned anything about copyright. On the other hand, comments included WP:NOT repository of information (from the nominator), It seems unnecessary to create archives for months in one particular sports league, Monthly season pages are excessive. This level of detail is unencylopedic, month-by-month listings of every league result ever played is too detailed to be considered encyclopaedic. Punkmorten 21:06, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 * No, but the fact that the article did not have any content, as opposed to this one, could have influenced the decision. Sam Vimes | Address me 21:21, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'll agree with Sam Vimes, however, references to support notability appears to be lacking in the article as it stands. If there was some external references it would have me put a vote in. Until then, I'm staying Neutral on this one. Torinir  ( Ding my phone  My support calls   E-Support Options  ) 20:46, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 * References added. Sam Vimes | Address me 21:21, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep So, maybe an improvement is needed. But that doesn't mean we should delete it just because it doesn't meet someone's standards. How about actually trying to improve articles before the afd thing comes. Kingjeff 01:42, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * No improvement is needed. It just needs to go. Punkmorten 16:25, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Everything in this article is already contained in Fußball-Bundesliga 2006/07.  Lazybum 03:56, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as repetitive article, per Lazybum. Torinir  ( Ding my phone  My support calls   E-Support Options  ) 18:53, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - If I find that the page becomes to big, I will not hesitate to reintroduce this page. Kingjeff 22:04, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Recreation of deleted material is subject to speedy deletion. Lazybum 02:15, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Well...the material may be deleted, but it's still part of the encyclopedia when it's in Fußball-Bundesliga 2006/07. If that article becomes too big, does this prevent the logical month-by-month split of the Bundesliga article? Sam Vimes | Address me 18:59, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Only if you want an edit war. Kingjeff 02:32, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Play nice. Threatening an edit war will get us nowhere.  Lazybum 02:47, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

I didn't make any threat. You did. Kingjeff 02:48, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * And please behave like an adult. Your comment is more appropriate of feuding schoolchildren.  Lazybum 03:59, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

and now you know how old I am? Kingjeff 18:09, 12 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.