Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fußball-Bundesliga - September 2006


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete - as pointed out, the info can be preserved in the whole season article.Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 02:47, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Fußball-Bundesliga - September 2006
WP:NOT (repository of information) Yy-bo 19:47, 2 September 2006 (UTC) Comment - You realize that this month's article will end up looking like last month's article? Kingjeff 17:42, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Computerjoe 's talk 20:05, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - I have no clue on what you're talking about. Kingjeff 20:35, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - I can garantee everyone that this will be filled by the end of next weekend. So it's not really worth anyones time to delete it. The same will happen for any other month. Kingjeff 20:42, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - Consider webhosting for this sort of work. User:Yy-bo 17:40, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - I think it should be kept but KingJeff, you've got to stop creating pages and not filling them with information, make a rough version in your sandbox first then move it to the space, otherwise the page is just worthless to anyone and deserves deleting, use the template from the August page and fill it up with fixtures. --shanda 21:04, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, empty. In any case I'm against having individual articles for months in sports leagues - it is heavy fancruft. Punkmorten 21:19, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. It seems unnecessary to create archives for months in one particular sports league, especially given that the article is completely empty. --Wafulz 22:57, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'm not sure if you realize this. But We're not even 48 hours into the month. Kingjeff 23:15, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - annual season pages are great. Monthly season pages are excessive.  This level of detail is unencylopedic. Resolute 00:57, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. Alias Flood 02:17, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. – Elisson • Talk 12:16, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - month-by-month listings of every league result ever played is too detailed to be considered encyclopaedic. Qwghlm 12:21, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge I see everyones point about it being not encyclopaedic so maybe it should just be merged with the main season article, of course not this actual one, but one which is formatted better looking like the Fußball-Bundesliga - August 2006 version instead? --shanda 13:53, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Is it that time to reopen Centralized discussion/Sports results? Zzyzx11 (Talk) 15:31, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Resolute. Article Fu%C3%9Fball-Bundesliga_2006/07 already has all the content except for the dates of the games which would be easy enough to add to the cross-grid if it was felt really necessary. - fchd 17:58, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Qwghlm. - Pal 18:47, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.