Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuad Kavur


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 06:37, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Fuad Kavur

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article does not meet biographical «creative professionals» notability requirements. Article appears to be created and updated by subject. KejwfnNKR (talk) 04:51, 25 December 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:30, 1 January 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:00, 8 January 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist. Not the best sourced article (or even adequately sourced) but I don't see a strong argument here, or any support, for deleting this article. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:28, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Turkey,  and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 10:38, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Comment. Adequate sources for article do not look to exist. Looking with English language newspapers, the references are are in letters to the editor from the subject only: <>, <>.


 * The fact established that the subject is a named producer on the notable film mentioned is sourced. The subject's name the New York Times as the producer of the film mentioned in the article: <>. The subject's name is all that is mentioned. This does not seem to meet notability guidelines. Google Books results are all to indexes which confirm the fact. The book by the subject mentioned on the page appears self published, with no external references, and is non-notable. The opera mentioned, sourced in the article from <> is a non-notable student production at University of London.
 * The article is currently self promotional. I would happy improve the article, but there are not adequate sources to support notability of the subject. KejwfnNKR (talk) 15:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails GNG or NBIO. I couldnt locate any reliable sources that could improve this article. `~HelpingWorld~` (👽🛸) 22:20, 21 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.