Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuat Ergin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  16:30, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Fuat Ergin

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article simply announces the rapper's existence and makes no statement of notability. This is probably because he has received almost no significant and reliable media coverage, and is only visible in the standard retail and streaming databases. The same is true of his various alternate stage names. None of his albums have reliable or informative reviews either, and are themselves only available at the standard retail and streaming sites.  DOOMSDAYER 520 | TALK | CONTRIBS 20:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  DOOMSDAYER 520 | TALK | CONTRIBS 20:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions.  DOOMSDAYER 520 | TALK | CONTRIBS 20:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment Keep These all seem like reliable sources for me: Sözcü, Milliyet , Hürriyet , Cumhuriyet , Radikal . ~Styyx   Talk? ^-^  09:03, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment from Nominator - Just because the publication (newspaper) is notable, this does not guarantee that the article about the person under discussion is significant or helps with notability. Of the five newspaper articles listed: #1 and #4 are possibly useful for info about the rapper's history, but they are softball introductory interviews. #2 is nothing but a brief promotional announcement. #3 is a brief notice about the guy's wedding. #5 is a PR piece about an upcoming album. In my view, none of those satisfy the significant coverage requirement for this musician despite being reliable publications otherwise.  DOOMSDAYER 520 | TALK | CONTRIBS 20:11, 26 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep Notable and what Styyx said. Omniscientmoose42 (talk) 09:05, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per Styyx. --► Sincerely:  Sola Virum  18:54, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Clearly notable and well-covered per Styyx's sources. Plus there is likely even more out there that was not listed here.--Seacactus 13 (talk) 22:18, 31 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.