Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fubism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!)  08:09, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

Fubism
Probable hoax, GameFAQs junk.--Sean Jelly Baby? 02:35, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
 * I strongly believe that this article should NOT be deleted. Fubism has gained a lot of steam recently and it has hundreds of followers. It is no different than any other small religious organization and information deserves to be available to all who request it. It would be a great shame if this perspective was shot down in the age of tolerance of religion.

That's just my view. Thanks.
 * Delete as with Votes for deletion/Church of The Giant Golden Microphone. Gazpacho 03:04, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 'Delete NN &asymp; jossi &asymp; 03:11, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Wow, hundreds of followers. Impressive. Groeck 04:04, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Suspected hoax or joke. Got an impressive 5 hits on Google on the word fubism, none of which seemed relevant; and 0 relevant hits out of 7 on “Joseph of Knox”. &spades; DanMS 04:13, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Religions that have not been noticed by others in society (as seen by the lack of relevant Google hits) are non-notable. --Metropolitan90 06:20, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Stop the next Scientology before it starts. :)  Jwissick  (t)  (c)  07:39, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - even Scientology is a notable joke, at least. Nae'blis 21:37, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, if only it could be speedied alf 11:29, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.