Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuck Me Jesus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. -- Cirt (talk) 22:41, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Fuck Me Jesus

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NALBUMS - no sources, no establisment of notability, demos generally fail notability MrMoustacheMM (talk) 19:37, 18 January 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:22, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

keep mets gnThisbites (talk) 19:19, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:MUSIC. Qworty (talk) 04:06, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Firslty, the band is notable. Secondly, although this was originally released as a demo, it was later released commercially (twice), so any arguments that it should be treated purely as a demo don't wash. There's also quite a bit of coverage about, particularly relating to the sleeve art - The cultic milieu: oppositional subcultures in an age of globalization, Gigwise.com, Chiesa News, LA Weekly. Perhaps not in-depth coverage, but it's an official release by a notable band and there's no problem with verifiability.--Michig (talk) 07:20, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:MUSIC.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 16:05, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.