Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuck the Dealer (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep. --Luigi30 (&Tau;&alpha;&lambda;&kappa; &tau;&omicron; m&epsilon;) 22:08, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Fuck the Dealer
One of the unsourced, and at this time externally unverifiable drinking game articles listed in a mass deletion earlier today (Articles for deletion/Circle of Death (drinking game)) Per the closing statement of this aborted mass-nomination, this is an individual relist of the article. -- Saberwyn 10:20, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Adding a request for verifiable sources to this article page would be a good way to start this process.  Not having verification isn't an automatic deletion criterion, being unverifiable is - an important distinction.  Before nominating an article for deletion, shouldn't the nominator at least research the article themselves, adding the sources if possible?  I haven't tackled notability as this is not the reason given for nomination, but all drinking game are cultural memes that have lasted in many cases for centuries and appear in various places in popular literature etc. Vizjim 11:43, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete who respects an encyclopedia that contains articles about drinking games? - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 12:04, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Encyclopedia, Noun: "Book (supposedly) containing all knowledge". Vizjim 13:05, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, listed in the Best Drinking Games Book Ever under Hi-Lo, and with 250+ Amazon.com drinking game books listed... --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEMES?) 13:21, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per User:Crzrussian; verifiable but unencyclopedic cruft. Angus McLellan (Talk) 18:24, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't see an assertion of notability, and there's been no good reason suggested to keep this.  Brian G. Crawford 21:20, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Except, you know, a published book noting it. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEMES?) 12:38, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep' If there are other drinking gaes listed then list this
 * Keep -- GWO
 * keep this just needs to be sourced. Dspserpico 18:01, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * weak delete Due to the point about this being an instruction manual. It seems to belong either in Wiktionary or perhaps as a two-sentence entry in "Drinking Games".Apollo 10:43, 9 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.