Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuck the Troops

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 09:31, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Fuck the Troops
Local "grassroots" organization against supporting the US military, but Google hasn't heard of it. Delete - Marcika 21:37, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC) DELETE THIS LIBERAL CRAP RIGHT NOW!!!!!!!!!!
 * Delete agree --Xcali 21:44, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable. --FCYTravis 21:51, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not exactly "liberal crap" since most liberals (along with Libertarians and Constitutionalists) are focused on bringing troops home. More likely anarchists looking to stir chaos. -- BD2412 talk 21:57, 2005 Jun 15 (UTC)
 * Delete Not because this is "liberal crap"- I agree with it to a certain extent- but because its not anything approaching an encyclopedia article. It's one mans soapbox.
 * Delete Inherently POV, non-notable, and a whole lot of other good reasons. --Scimitar 22:37, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete This article offends me on so many levels.--EatAlbertaBeef 22:49, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete This article is a bad parody of an antiwar organization, at best --Myself 23:19, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable. Though I'd love to vote keep because in a thoroughly militaristic, jingoistic society like America he just has to have the biggest balls to come up with a slogan like that.  My preferred slogan for this kind of situation comes from that old anti-war heroine Lizzie Strata: Don't fuck the troops! --Tony Sidaway|Talk 22:57, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment - From the iMDB article about the film - "All actors perform naked. This was due not simply to the budget being too small to accommodate the appropriate costumes and regalia...". Excellent reference, by the way. -- Jonel | Speak 04:01, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Lysistrata is one hell of a funny play. Get to see it if you can. 2500 years old and it's still got em rolling in the aisles. Hey, maybe we should change our votes to "redirect to Lysistrata". :) --Tony Sidaway|Talk 22:19, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Awww the article wasn't about what I thought it was going to be about. *Pouts*  Well, delete it anyway, not because it's liberal because, well, I am, but because it's non-notable. -- Francs2000 | Talk  23:01, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete notability not etsbalished. JamesBurns 23:20, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unless verified, then keep. Taco Deposit | Talk-o to Taco 00:02, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unverifiable. -- Jonel | Speak 04:01, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-verifiable, (although I am tempted to vote keep just to piss off the childish anon whose caps lock key is down). func (talk) 04:09, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ditto. Nestea 11:58, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unverifiable. Hoax. Not-notable. Offensive. Sjakkalle (Check!)  06:51, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .