Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuckable art


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete - CSD G1 TerriersFan 04:36, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Fuckable art
All original research, has already been speedied, not notable, very likely hoax Dethme0w 04:09, 13 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete and salt. Now let me get this straight.  Not only did someone exhume Florence Nightingale and copulate with her remains, but he recorded it on an iPhone and convinced someone it was art?  This should have been speedied, WAS speedied once, and the creator is now deleting tags.  So we do this the hard way.  Dethme0w 04:12, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete You should have just retagged it. Removing his own tags doesn't make it un-speediable. That said, I nearly fell out of my chair when I saw the title. Funny as it may be, it's nonsense. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 04:13, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Yup, if I thought retagging would be effective that's what I'd have done. We can get it salted this way too. Dethme0w 04:19, 13 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete as fast as possible. Eddie.willers 04:14, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Already been tagged for speedy. - Rjd0060 04:18, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. Salt. Yuk. Majoreditor 04:28, 13 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.