Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fucking Bitch Club

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete.

Fucking Bitch Club
Vanity of non notable forum members. Sadly, not patent nonsense because it probably exists. --BesigedB (talk) 21:57, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete: Vanity, nonnotable. &mdash;tregoweth 22:15, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete WP is not a humour website, and even if it exists it isn't worthy of encyclopedic inclusion. Starblind 22:56, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. 26 hits on Google, but none related to this. TigerShark 23:07, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nonsense.  RickK 23:24, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence this is encyclopedic, or attempt to provide any. On the contrary, just another attempt (perhaps in good faith) to use Wikipedia as a personal blog. Andrewa 23:29, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree. Echidnae 23:59, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete an article about more than one person can still be vanity Philip 00:06, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity nn. Xtra 00:30, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity.-gadfium 01:08, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: Nonnotable.Zosodada 01:12, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, possible vanity. Megan1967 03:49, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable ad. The slew of anon "Keep" votes certainly raises my ears. --Deathphoenix 06:18, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, it's a spammy ad meant to get attention. Wyss 07:08, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, agree with above. Timbo ( t a l k )  09:24, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Let it stay. It's not patent nonsense because the group and people actually do exist, and it doesn't violate the terms of service. Censoring it because you don't personally think the users are notable goes against the spirit of the Wikipedia. 5:22, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC) (anon IP vote)
 * Kept: Humorous. 5:22, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC) (anon IP vote)
 * Those two votes both by the article author. Andrewa 23:43, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Let it stay. Yes; they exist.  http://www.dailyjolt.com/forum/read.html?id=218539  This forum, because it appeals to college students, experiences an ever-changing group of users.  Despite this, those named to the Fucking Bitch Club are regulars and questions will inevitably arise regarding this now-endearing moniker "Fucking Bitch."  An explanation available to internet users is appropriate. (anon IP vote)
 * This vote by an anon with no other contributions, perhaps another forum member. Andrewa 23:47, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Just because something exists doesn't mean it needs an encyclopedia article. RickK 23:24, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep . Problem does not require deletion. Such a minor branch of a subject that it doesn't deserve an article. Merge the useful content into a more comprehensive article and redirect. There is already a Wikipedia entry for the Daily Jolt. -- 00:18, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC) (anon IP vote)
 * Comment: Please sign your posts. This by an anon with no other contributions other than a test which they reverted. Possibly another forum member. Merge requires redirect to preserve the history as required by the GFDL. If forum members wish to expand the Daily Jolt article, they should do so directly. No change of vote. Andrewa 00:48, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete agree with above.--Boothy443 09:29, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity. Etz Haim 12:14, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, vanity. 5 (now 6) individual users on a forum that most people have never heard of? Sorry, not worthy of encyclopedia space in its own article. Might have possibly been acceptable as an illustrative example in another article, but I can't see how. It's not exactly the Something Awful Forums. Sockatume 15:38, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)