Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fueled by Ramen Release Catalog


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was already redirected to Fueled by Ramen. Sjakkalle (Check!)  15:06, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Fueled by Ramen Release Catalog
Oh boy, now spam comes in easy to open lists Ruby 02:53, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, list is almost blank. You can take all the time you want; we don't care about it. Royboycrashfan 02:57, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I have been working hard on this Release Catalog. I would appreiciate it if you did not delete it. --Russ is the sex 03:05, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. My vote will change to keep if you add context and background to the article, and perhaps tag it with one of those nifty "incomplete list" notices. Also, even if it is kept, perhaps a name change is in order? - Corbin Simpson 03:09, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I have tagged it with an Incomplete List notice as asked. --Russ is the sex 03:12, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Ardenn 04:07, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I am adding more information by the hour. It should be finished very soon. Please don't delete this. --Russ is the sex 04:37, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Avi 04:58, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I have, yet again, added even more information. Why do you keep voting to delete this?--Russ is the sex 05:36, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Sun Tzu said, "You can add link after link to a chain, but never once does it show any sign of wanting to stand up by itself." Ruby 05:53, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Like I said, I'll change my vote once there is context and background. - Corbin Simpson 06:30, 9 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete unreferenced, unverifiable. This could be published elsewhere and linked to, perhaps, but of what use is it? Fagstein 05:45, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I got the idea from a similar list on Drive-Thru Records. It serves a genuine purpose there, and it should serve one here as well. --Russ is the sex 06:53, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * An alternative idea would be to merge the release catalog with the list of artists into the main article (which is rather short), like has been done with Drive-Thru, and strip the release numbers which aren't of any real use outside the company. Fagstein 15:19, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Changing vote to merge, as it is now. Fagstein 17:49, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. Russ, the very fact alone that it's tagged with a "major edit" that lasts nearly a month indicates strongly that it's "your" article; articles here belong to everyone/no one - in short, if you'll note on each edit page, If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it.  Unless the article serves a valid purpose (and right now it doesn't), how could you expect anyone to vote any differently?  If you must take time to build it, build a Sandbox page in your user space and develop it there before making it live.  Until that time, my vote won't change; I doubt anyone else's will, either. Changing vote to Merge in light of the further developments.--み使い Mitsukai 07:15, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I have taken your advice. I deleted the "major edit" box. At the time, I wanted to make sure that the format of the list was not edited. I have no worries about that now. The reason I don't want to take the advice of Fagstein, is because I don't want to clutter the Fueled By Ramen page. However, I will take that advice if it is necessary for me to do so. If you want proof of my information, please visit the release page on the label's official website. For release dates, I have used Amazon.com. I have other sources of information that I will use to determine the identity of the missing releases. I will eventually add these links to the bottom of the page. I don't see why you say that this list does not serve a valid purpose. The purpose is to see the history of releases by the label. I will continue to work on this article, and I will put it in the proper place that you determine. Thank you. --Russ is the sex 16:37, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * If you click on the "Sandbox" link in my message, that will set up your Sandbox, and you should be able to copy the article there and work on it until it's good enough to go live. Hope this helps.--み使い Mitsukai 16:59, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I copied it to my Sandbox. Since my article will be ready to go live within the hour, I see no need for the deletion of this page. I will edit the page with the final version when I am done. --Russ is the sex 20:59, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable. --Ter e nce Ong (恭喜发财) 08:33, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 'Delete per nom. No background is given on what the list even is. -- † Ðy§ep§ion † 19:05, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * That is simply untrue. I added more information though. --Russ is the sex 20:59, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * That may be so, but articles remain AFD until a definitive consensus is reached (usually takes about a week). You can still make edits to the article (like paste in the rest of it to replace what is currently there); it will just still remain AFD until the consensus is done.  That's how it is for every article that's nominated for AFD.--み使い Mitsukai 21:41, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I understand. I have no problem with that. --Russ is the sex 22:00, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I'd have voted for deletion if this were one of those "two guys in mom's basement" micro-indie labels. However, it includes multi-platinum-selling records like Fall Out Boy's "From Under The Cork Tree", which is currently #28 on Billboard's album chart after 40 weeks (its peak was #9).  At the very least, this should be merged with Fueled by Ramen, which is presently a stub. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  00:27, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I think merge is a good compromise. Fagstein 01:30, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per starblind. Bad ideas 06:28, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as a list of interest to very few people and apparently created just for the sake of having such a list, i.e. listcruft. Also violations of WP:OWN. Stifle 09:40, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * There is no violation. Also, how do you know what other people are interested in. Are you a psychic? It may not be interesting to you, but others may be interested. The examples shown on listcruft do not apply to this list. --Russ is the sex 16:31, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge I am going to merge my article with the Fueled By Ramen article right now. I have only a few releases missing. --Russ is the sex 16:39, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I have merged the page. The separate page can now be deleted. --Russ is the sex 16:49, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Article redirected. This can be closed now.--み使い Mitsukai 17:24, 10 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.