Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuelmyblog (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:01, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Fuelmyblog
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notability. Two pieces of churnalistic press coverage in 2007 and 2008; WP:BEFORE shows zero coverage since then. The article has never been much better than this. Previous AFD kept partly on the basis of a Sun advertorial. If anyone can find meaningful RS coverage for Fuelmyblog ... David Gerard (talk) 22:04, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 22:04, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 22:04, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 23:04, 28 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:NCORP. Classic startup. The Guardian media section reference is a press release. scope_creep Talk  23:26, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TNT - extremely vague claims, poor sourcing, and inconsistent citation style - as well as WP:GNG concerns. Bearian (talk) 22:33, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG Georgiamarlins (talk) 21:48, 4 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.