Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuelomat–Orpak Arbitration


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:27, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Fuelomat–Orpak Arbitration

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Zero content. looks to be a placeholder of some sort. TiMike (talk) 20:23, 6 September 2013 (UTC) TiMike (talk) 20:23, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:00, 6 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. It was empty because it had been page-blank vandalized by an IP a couple weeks ago.  I've restored what little content was there.  Despite that, there's only a couple sentences, no references to indicate notability, and I can find no information about the arbitration to indicate it might be notable.  So, delete, even in its restored state. TJRC (talk) 23:49, 6 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - No indication of notability in the article nor from my own searches. -- Whpq (talk) 16:44, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.