Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuerza Grafica


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Sango 123  02:57, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Fuerza Grafica
Orphaned AfD nomination. I think it is being nominated for lack of notability, although if the article is accurate it has that. However, it should be assessed against WP:CORP. Please ensure such assessment is done, rather than kneejerk "voting" in either direction. Technical nomination - no opinion from me, I'm seeking community and expert input. Thanks. ➨  ЯEDVERS  18:59, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Rje 00:16, 2 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - Does not appear to be notable by any of the major search engines. Yahoo had the most with 36 unique hits. (with clones) I don't see any 3rd party writing about this company, and I fail to see what it has done to make it any different from any other company. Good luck finding the company website. —— Eagle (ask me for help) 02:39, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Michael 04:32, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Company is pretty non notable, Coca Cola employs thousands of sub contractors and companies to handle its printing, logistics, computers, ingredients etc. Its client list alone does not make it notable. Until more information is supplied such as financial statements or other information necessary to guage more accuratly against WP:CORP, I will stick with delete. The website is on a .mx host if you had trouble finding it its noted now in the article. -- zero faults   ' '' 12:38, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Company is non-notable, unfortunately. -- Big  top  15:14, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CORP. --Slgr @ ndson (page - messages - contribs) 15:20, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.