Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fugitive Projects


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion.  MBisanz  talk 02:30, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Fugitive Projects

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It exists, but I can't establish that it meets WP:NOTABILITY. Boleyn (talk) 14:55, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:16, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:16, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:16, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  bibliomaniac 1  5  02:20, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree that a mix of local press coverage and festival programmes isn’t sufficient to show notability. Mccapra (talk) 02:32, 30 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.