Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuk Wa Street


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 22:27, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Fuk Wa Street

 * – ( View AfD View log )

unsourced article on one of many streets in Hong Kong; no indication why the road is notable Ohconfucius  ¡digame! 04:31, 16 February 2012 (UTC)


 * A quick Googling turned up absolutely nothing as far as reliable sources go, and the article on Sham Shui Po already contains everything in the Fuk Wa Street article. Delete.TheRealTeln (talk) 06:30, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Adding native language search terms:
 * —  C M B J  10:02, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. But only the first and the forth are native, and no one actually writes in the forth. It's like a pronunciation guide. 147.8.102.172 (talk) 07:42, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions.  — Frankie (talk) 17:54, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  — Frankie (talk) 17:54, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. But only the first and the forth are native, and no one actually writes in the forth. It's like a pronunciation guide. 147.8.102.172 (talk) 07:42, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions.  — Frankie (talk) 17:54, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  — Frankie (talk) 17:54, 17 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect. I have already placed a request for redirect on the article page and on the Sham Shui Po article. Content has been merged. Now everything is ready for a redirect. I just don't understand why a deletion, which will erase the article's history is even considered. Note to those reading a bit too fast: deletion IS NOT THE SAME as redirection. Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 15:47, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. This street is long enough to extend way beyond Cheung Sha Wan, another neighbourhood near Sham Shui Po. 147.8.102.172 (talk) 07:36, 21 February 2012 (UTC) — 147.8.102.172 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. and probably a sock  — 174.8.102.172 (talk • contribs) has been blocked as a sockpuppet.
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B  music  ian  01:52, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Keep. Notable.--JuntungWu (talk) 14:33, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * That bare assertion means nothing. Where are the sources documenting this street?  Uncle G (talk) 23:40, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:36, 2 March 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.