Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Full fledged city


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 21:11, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Full fledged city

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable theory that has far as I can tell has existed for a couple of months. Cameron Scott (talk) 12:56, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I had PROD'ed this article, but this AFD overtook that process. This definition of "full fledged city" appears to be the thesis of a single author, not a generally accepted definition of the term.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:58, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Smacks of being a NEO term, lacking wide spread usage. Dennis Brown (talk) 13:05, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: Non-notable. SL93 (talk) 21:55, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 8 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete scientifically, this is a definition for a new concept, and a potential hypothesis, but not even a theory. not notable at this time.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:01, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 17:34, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not notable at all. --Gagg me with ah spoon (talk) 20:15, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.