Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Full results of the South Australian state election, 2014


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete both as duplicate articles with titles that are unlikely search terms. ansh 666 05:18, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Full results of the South Australian state election, 2014

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This nomination also covers:
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

These two pages needlessly duplicate information better covered elsewhere. The tables themselves can be found in dedicated pages for the lower (2014, 2010) and upper (2014, 2010 houses, as well as at the main election pages (2014, 2010) - there is slightly different formatting in some cases but this is insignificant. The maps can also be found at the main pages, while the order of election information is conveyed on the dedicated Legislative Council pages (and the table here could be added there without much difficulty if people are really attached to it). I was originally looking to redirect these but I don't think there's a clear target and it's not a likely search term, so deletion would be the better option. Frickeg (talk) 07:37, 25 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Frickeg (talk) 07:41, 25 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Superseded format article that doesn't have an easy merge target. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 08:28, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 08:47, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:11, 25 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete duplicate of identical content elsewhere. oppose merge/redirect as unlikely search term "full results". LibStar (talk) 01:13, 26 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.