Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Full spectral imaging


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:18, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Full spectral imaging

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Does not seem to meet notability requirements, appears to deal with a single person's work on a new topic that has not attracted much attention. A13ean (talk) 22:56, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * To clarify, the phrase "full spectral imaging" is often used in a general way to refer to various imaging spectroscopy techniques, and not in the specific way described in the article. A13ean (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 22:59, 14 September 2010 (UTC).


 * Keep - scholar Ghits from more than one author. Perfectly good start. Bearian (talk) 18:21, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. I note that the paper described as the first discussion of this topic has, according to Google Scholar, attracted a grand total of two citations in six years, both in papers whose main subject is hyperspectral imaging. Juxtapositions of the words "full" "spectral" and "imaging" are not necessarily references to the subject of this article. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:51, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, I see what you mean.... Bearian (talk) 16:30, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 05:00, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Merge to hyperspectral imaging? Bearian (talk) 23:25, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.