Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuller Industrial


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 13:01, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Fuller Industrial

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Delete. Non-notable company. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 06:10, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:22, 11 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fuller is notable because it is the only company where the tank and pipe manufacturing and coating/rubber lining are done at the same plant, under the same roof. Also notable is the fact that Fuller is not reserved to "local" jobs and contracts, but rather has an international and global focus.  When a business article attempts to argue notability in its text, directly or indirectly, this usually means it isn't notable.  Neither these aspects, nor the trade awards and other "recognitions" in the article, turn this business into something you'd expect to find in a general interest encyclopedia. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:07, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 08:06, 19 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment Maybe worth pointing out that the originator of the page has put their view on Talk:Fuller Industrial. AllyD (talk) 18:16, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  —AllyD (talk) 18:17, 20 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete I can't find anything beyond the local media coverage that is referenced in the article, which feels like it falls short of WP:CORPDEPTH demonstration of notability. But having cross-referred this AfD to the Canada Wikiproject, it is possible that someone there will make a persuasive argument for notability. AllyD (talk) 18:21, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.