Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fulltiming


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. The Bushranger One ping only 01:48, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Fulltiming

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  Cliff  Smith 17:44, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  Cliff  Smith 17:44, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

This article is about what itself describes as "a loose term" referring to a subset of RVers. It is completely OR with only three somewhat relevant external links and is linked by only four articles. It would be best if it were covered in just a few sentences in the Recreational_vehicle section. 69.255.170.55 (talk) 00:37, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above nomination was copied from Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion at the request of the IP editor. Monty  845  00:45, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 July 26.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  01:05, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep/Merge - I added three books to the article, with "Fulltiming" or "Full Time" in their title, with reference to RV'ing. So, it's a real thing, which may merit its own article, or at least a substantial section if merged. --Lexein (talk) 02:17, 26 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep - No valid rationale for deletion has been stated per WP:DEL-REASON. This topic has clearly received significant coverage in reliable sources.
 * More sources: Google Books search.
 * Also, per WP:NRVE, topic notability is about the availability of significant coverage in reliable sources, and not based upon whether or not sources are present in articles. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:06, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * More sources: Google Books search.
 * Also, per WP:NRVE, topic notability is about the availability of significant coverage in reliable sources, and not based upon whether or not sources are present in articles. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:06, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * Also, per WP:NRVE, topic notability is about the availability of significant coverage in reliable sources, and not based upon whether or not sources are present in articles. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:06, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.