Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fulmer Cup


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  → Call me  Hahc  21  16:09, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Fulmer Cup

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Rejected PROD. PROD rationaile stands: "Non-notable gag award created by a non-notable blogger that has serious BLP issues. Fails WP:N." Just because the blog is run/hosted by SBNation (one of the reasons for the PROD rejection) doesn't make the blog notable or reliable; and there is no significant coverage outside of the blog itself to establish notability, and the WP:BLP issues here are massive. The Bushranger One ping only 04:29, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:32, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:33, 7 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Does not pass WP:GNG as there is no coverage in any reliable sources. There is a dead CBS Sports link that might be the only RS. Even if it is, one mention isn't enough for an article on Wikipedia, IMO. — X96lee15 (talk) 14:05, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Funny. But not notable.--Paul McDonald (talk) 16:33, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, not supported by sufficient reliable sources. NawlinWiki (talk) 01:51, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.