Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fumble after Dark


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Despite the extra week (see W.marsh's comment at the bottom), no new sources were found/added, so the delete argument stands as the strongest and with consensus.  Daniel  07:45, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Fumble after Dark

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete non notable fan of a certain activity event without independent reliable sources to show its notability. Carlossuarez46 20:21, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as nonnotable. – Mike . lifeguard  &#124; @en.wb 20:41, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:N. Stifle (talk) 21:24, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  N F 24 (radio me!Editor review) 21:29, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment a fair amount of sources on a google test, but almost all are in Swedish, which I can't read, so I can't judge if they are reliable sources. Martijn Hoekstra 21:40, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment FAD is notable at least by local standards - it is the biggest event in Sweden (~ 140-150 particpants in 2007) and has been featured on TV and local newspapers. Also been briefly mentioned in e.g. Icenrye's Geocaching Videozine. Is the article considered OK by wikipedia standards if more sources are added? --Blaufish 22:20, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I can't speak for the community, and things might still change in the article, but if it was sourced by reliable sources, that indicate notability (and it sounds like they do), I would be in favour of keeping the article. Martijn Hoekstra 22:27, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, W.marsh 18:34, 12 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Relisting to give more time for sources to be found. --W.marsh 18:34, 12 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.