Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fumio Nakajima


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Article was a WP:BLP with no sources.  Sandstein  20:23, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Fumio Nakajima

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod (by IP); No assertion or demonstration of notability, and had been tagged as a concern since Feb 2008 ratarsed (talk) 18:19, 29 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.   —Quasirandom (talk) 20:05, 29 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment: Actually, there was an assertion of notability, but it was in the article on Lolita Anime rather than here: he wrote the manga which was adapted as the OVA series. The consensus of WikiProject Anime and Manga is that, given the status of OVAs in Japan (which are often of higher quality than television series, comparible to theatrical releases), an OVA adaptation counts as a making a manga notable by WP:BK C3. Whether being the author of one demonstratably notable work makes that person notable depends on your personal interpretation of WP:CREATIVE. —Quasirandom (talk) 20:05, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * That said, given it's only one marginally notable work, I'm inclined to merge to that work -- Lolita Anime. If someone can demonstrate at least one other of Nakajima's works is notable (even if we don't get around to creating the article yet) or that he passes the general notability guideline, I'll change that to a keep. —Quasirandom (talk) 20:05, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Being the guy behind the first hentai series is a pretty strong notability claim, [citation needed] or not. Not opposed to merging though. --erachima talk 03:20, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:11, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:41, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Wait, it was? Does that mean the 5 days resets to now? —Quasirandom (talk) 16:38, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes. The problem was that apparently this page wasn't relisted together with the ones of October 4. The idea is that relisting gives more time for discussion, but also that it may attract more people to carry new arguments toward or against deletion. Tizio 12:20, 8 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.   —Fg2 (talk) 00:17, 7 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. No reference sources demonstrating that this satisfies notability guidelines. --DAJF (talk) 00:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.