Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fun Hog


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy deleted by AuburnPilot.  Daniel Bryant  10:21, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Fun Hog

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Neologisms unfortunately require full deletion process, i would advise speedy deletion though --Jimmi Hugh 03:22, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong and Obvious Delete. Too bad we gotta wait this one out since it doesn't meed any speedy deletion criteria. → Ed Gl  03:39, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * sigh and delete - can't we speedy under patent nonsense? it's only neo if ive heard of it ;) the_undertow talk  06:38, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - Actually now you mention it, i can't really understand what the article is saying... it makes no sense, almost nonsense actually. --Jimmi Hugh 06:42, 19 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.