Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fun management


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 01:25, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Fun management

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

POV essay, original research, referenced almost entirely with unreliable sources. Creator removed PROD tag without explanation. Baffle gab1978 (talk) 01:36, 7 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - the original author says it best. There are no sources or any real definition of this management style.  Nothing to establish notability.   GB fan  talk 02:49, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per article text: "there is no exact definition or sources about it". Article topic does not have sufficient coverage to pass WP:N and may also lack sufficient context for other editors to meaningfully improve the article. - DustFormsWords (talk) 03:09, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Nom, GB fan & DustFormsWords. Codf1977 (talk) 10:25, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not encyclopedic. Jusdafax  17:12, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Essay. Joe Chill (talk) 20:09, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, Essay, OR, speculation, errors, etc. Hairhorn (talk) 02:57, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.