Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Functionability


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. &mdash; J I P | Talk 14:00, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

Functionability
DicDef, or neologism as none of the online dictionaries I consulted referenced the word. Anyway, it doesn't belong in an encyclopedia Outlander 17:00, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
 * delete for lack of context. Such a list of terms could be encyclopedic if in the context of the endeavour in which they are used! &mdash; brighterorange  (talk) 18:52, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Relisting for more involvement. -Splash talk 00:52, 1 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete &mdash; neologism. Andrew pmk | Talk 03:29, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Reads like somebody's PowerPoint presentation. Delete neologism &mdash;Wahoofive (talk) 05:11, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete--Rogerd 08:33, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.