Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FundTool


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  04:02, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

FundTool

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails the notability guidelines for companies. Repeatedly deleted under G11. Creator has COI. Exclusively sourced to press releases and the company's own website. – Teratix ₵ 03:29, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, Websites,  and Georgia (U.S. state).  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  10:55, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - Non-notable spam. Previous attempts have been CSD'd. This is no better. Cited articles aren't even about the subject. DarkAudit (talk) 12:28, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * No problems with speedy deletion. – Teratix ₵ 16:50, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Could potentially speedy even yeah. Alpha3031 (t • c) 15:18, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: References don't appear relevant, deletion might be the best course of action.  Waqar 💬 18:31, 5 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per DarkAudit. Looks like G11 and possibly G4 as well. Aydoh8 (talk &#124; contribs) 02:45, 8 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.