Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fund for UFO Research (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  10:42, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Fund for UFO Research
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

A 2009 N/C but nothing then or now that meets WP:ORG level of coverage. Has been defunct for a decade, so no indication this will change. Star  Mississippi  15:50, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Companies.  Star   Mississippi  15:50, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 19:51, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: I did find this source on Wikipedia Library, but cannot tell what the actual publication is, so can't comment on quality of source: McCarthy, P. “UFOs in Washington: The Fund for UFO Research Is Working for the Cause on Capitol Hill.” Omni 14, no. 8 (May 1992): 79. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=f6h&AN=9205184233&site=eds-live&scope=site. CT55555 (talk) 16:33, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I found something similar to that, likely an excerpt, but I unfortunately couldn't find evidence that the hearings ever took place. I'm not 100% sold on my government database research so might have missed it. Star   Mississippi  17:21, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I suspect this explains what the OMNI thing is about. - Roxy the grumpy dog . wooF 07:26, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:48, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep This is an organization so WP:NCORP guidelines apply. I can confirm that the link found by CT55555 is the entire article and is from the May 1992 issue of OMNI magazine and in my opinion although it lacks in-depth details, it could be argued either way on whether it meets NCORP criteria. I've searched also for "FUFOR". While the organization was well-known in certain circles, it is still a niche area and it is difficult to find good sources. The org published a lot themselves and are referenced in other books and magazines (and even in Air Force Research report regarding the Roswell Incident) but usually only as a mention-in-passing and no in-depth information. There is another small paragraph in UFO FAQ by David J Hogan. There another paragraph at the end of this book? and similarly in this one. In my opinion and having regard to the topic and the age of the organization, I think it squeaks past NCORP although I would be happier with one more really good reference.  HighKing++ 16:43, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep per High King and per more sources establishing WP:NCORP. I found some coverage in national papers and entries in two specialist encyclopedias by reputable publishers. However, there are some inaccuracies in the article. For example, Los Angeles Times and Washington Post and the encyclopedias all say the organization was based in Mount Rainier, Maryland not Alexandria, Virginia. Also, a 1996 Chicago Tribune article says Don Berliner was the Director of FUFOR (he was covered as he was in an episode of The X-Files broadcast in the 1996-1997 season) and our wiki article says he wasn't director until 1998 (so clearly our dates for directors are wrong; although the 2012 encyclopedia has the same dates so maybe the Chicago Tribune was mistaken on his role). See source publication info below.4meter4 (talk) 02:21, 1 July 2022 (UTC)




 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.