Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fundagelical

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 18:33, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Fundagelical
Neologism. Only link is to Dake-bonoism, which is also up for deletion. RickK 04:07, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as neologism.Feco 04:10, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, neologism. Megan1967 07:46, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * This isn't a term the poster made up - I've seen it before on freethinker websites, and Google shows 770 hits. Still, there isn't enough here for a full article. Redirect to fundamentalist. Firebug 09:43, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Given the way it's used here, a redirect to fundamentalist Christianity might work better. -- Smerdis of Tlön 15:39, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment I have seen this term used quite often on religious forums. It's usually used in a derisive context. --Randolph 01:19, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Even if the original editor didn't make it up, it's still a neologism. --Angr/comhrá 18:39, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.