Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fundamentalist Dumbledorian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  Sango  123    (e)  16:01, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Fundamentalist Dumbledorian
Term is not standard, just fancruft. Four Google hits without quotes, only one (Wikipedia) with quotes. Fbv65 e del (discuss 15:41, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not a bad article, but term was apparently created here.  &mdash; Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 15:51, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. PJM 16:31, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOR and WP:FICT. WP is not a dumping ground for Harry Potter fancruft.  Article presents no reliable sources to indicate notability for this topic.  Barno 17:04, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete long live Lord Voldemort. CanadianCaesar Cæsar is turn’d to hear 17:04, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete It is enough to say that the topic was discussed ad nauseam on fan forums.. which can be said in Albus Dumbledore. Aguerriero  ( talk ) 21:17, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * delete as per above. Wombdpsw 05:55, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete el mucho cruft. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 18:07, 26 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.