Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Funeral Age

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 00:22, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

Funeral Age
Bandcruft with 597 google hits. &rarr;I&ntilde;g&#333;lemo&larr;  talk  07:42, 2005 Jun 2 (UTC)
 * So if a band can be found on Google then it isn't worth inclusion in Wikipedia? Do they have to pass some sort of test of cultural relevance or something?  I just wrote the article and I'm confused as to why it's suddenly up for deletion. --JWhiton
 * See the guidelines at WP:MUSIC. The band in question doesn't appear to meet them. --Carnildo 22:15, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete nn band vanity. --Etacar11 00:17, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity and promotion of non-notable group. Does not meet any of the guidelines at WP:MUSIC Tobycat 04:34, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .