Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Funky Diamonds (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. After two close AFDs I'm opting for not relisting a second time and closing as no consensus. Instead of !voting, my own (admittedly quick) research using google.de indicate they very probably meet WP:BAND, and 's book sources pretty much clinched it § FreeRangeFrog croak 00:06, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Funky Diamonds
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

AfD involved only 2 people, and, so ended in no consensus. and also looked into the group's notability at WP:Articles for deletion/Funky Diamonds (album). tagged this for notability. Does have an article in 2 other languages, but I wasn't sure that this meets WP:NBAND or WP:GNG. Has been tagged for notability for 7 years, so it would be very good to finally get this resolved. Boleyn (talk) 19:14, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Two major label albums, at least one of which was a hit in Japan it seems, some coverage here, here and here - could really do with German editors to bring the German WP article up to scratch as it seems probable that further coverage exists in German sources. --Michig (talk) 20:09, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  20:19, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 00:40, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of a lasting impact. Longevitydude (talk) 01:12, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment-Unsure right now, the German article looks like it is notable but then it is deceiving when you look at the refs-only refs are to Youtube. Wgolf (talk) 02:46, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.