Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fupa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 06:18, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Fupa
Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day Booyabazooka 03:21, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Original research. Bobby1011 03:26, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Booya, I've seen people use this term on other websites, but it still doesn't make a good article. A redirect could be the answer (though I'm not sure what to), but I'm leaning towards delete right now. Royal Blue   T / C  03:30, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I agree that I may have tagged it wrong in my deletion vote, but it still strikes me as a neologism. I wouldn't put it in a dictionary, and certainly not an encyclopedia. ~ Booyabazooka 03:33, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Where should it redirect to? Internet slang? Bobby1011 03:37, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Perhaps. It does make sense. Royal Blue   T / C  03:39, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I would be more apt to add it to List of Internet slang, and redirect there... if it warrants being on that list. But I'm not sure... is this term really Internet-specific?  And how widespread is it? ~ Booyabazooka 03:44, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I doubt it's widespread, which is why I voted delete. Royal Blue   T / C  03:54, 26 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. I've certainly heard this term as well, but I don't think it belongs on Wikipedia, as it is essentially an Urban Dicdef. -- Kinu  t /c  04:04, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Mild delete. The slang term has been around for a few years, and didn't originate from the article's author, but the article doesn't really add anything. Mike Church 04:36, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete --Ter e nce Ong 15:40, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Kinu. &mdash;ERcheck @ 18:35, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, nnn (non-notable neologism).  &middot; rodii  &middot;  19:22, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, obviously. (Dictdef, non notable, begone with it). --kingboyk 19:23, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn-neo. -- Krash (Talk) 23:20, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep This term, to me, is offensive, disgusting, and demeaning. And I vote to keep it.  Wikepedia is here to spread knowledge, not to judge terminology. &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by Marcyu (talk &bull; contribs).
 * Delete per nom. Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 22:50, 3 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.