Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Furies: Erinyes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily moved to Draft:Furies: Erinyes. bd2412 T 14:49, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Furies: Erinyes

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Quite simply, a massive lump of original research. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:33, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 23:58, 19 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - per No original research. Wikipedia doesn't seem to be the right place for this page. It appears to be original research, not an encyclopedia topic. Ajpolino (talk) 00:38, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - I think that Furies: Erinyes is a helpful content page. Its value is that it provides information about a particular subject based upon first-hand source material. I think that it could be a featured article. &mdash; FUSTER1965 (talk) 05:25, 20 May 2017 (UTC). — FUSTER1965 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:29, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mythology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:29, 20 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as WP:OR and as a WP:FORK of Erinyes. Narky Blert (talk) 13:51, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment I thought the present article looked familiar. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Furies: Erinyes. (debate closed as userfy 28 January 2017). Narky Blert (talk) 17:45, 21 May 2017 (UTC)


 * I didn't realize that this page was nominated for deletion. I speedily moved it to Draft:Furies: Erinyes as clearly not ready for mainspace. bd2412  T 14:42, 22 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.