Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Furlenco


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:27, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Furlenco

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The sources are: a press release, and a primary source for an award of no evident notability. 115 employees, fails WP:CORP by some margin IMO. Guy (Help!) 14:58, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is the press release copied by The Economic Times and used as a primary source to the article. The article was originally constructed by a SPA using other fake news sources like yourstory.com (now blacklisted). — Brianhe (talk) 15:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
 * delete fails GNG CerealKillerYum (talk) 15:44, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as I see nothing better. Pinging, and .  SwisterTwister   talk  01:55, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:51, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:51, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:51, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

I think the deletion of the page Furlenco was not justified. There are so many sources and online links for the company. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shylove78 (talk • contribs) 04:27, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.