Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Furqan Force


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Nominator does not propose deletion, rather merging; closed per unanimous !keep vote and WP:SK1. If merging is still desired that should be discussed in the relevant places, The Bushranger One ping only 22:00, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Furqan Force

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A stub article. Should be merged with Ahmadi or some other article before it can be expanded. The Determinator  p  t  c  17:37, 4 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Oppose (originator) Since proposal I've expanded the article; it now covers the "5 W's", has four footnotes, and a photograph. I'd say it's a bit larger than a mergeable stub at this point. Further, I think just splicing it into Ahmadiyya would be giving it Undue weight, so probably best to mention and wikilink to this main article. MatthewVanitas (talk) 02:19, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 5 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep I don't find any issues with it. Reasonably sourced with reliable sources. And since nomination it has expanded three folds. -- S M S  Talk 19:22, 5 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment for nominator: From your nomination it seems you have nominated this article for merger and not for deletion. So in that case AFD is not the right venue. You should have taken it to Proposed mergers, though I don't support merger after it has been expanded by Matthew. -- S M S  Talk 19:32, 5 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep: 1) AFD is not clean up as said above, 2) independent notability asserted and sourced in the article. -- lTopGunl (talk) 11:16, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.