Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Furs Of The Dead


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was SNOW delete  via unanimous consent. While it technically might be entitled to run longer, the outcome is not in doubt. SALTing can be requested at RFPP if desired. Jclemens (talk) 06:06, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Furs Of The Dead

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The article appears to be about a non-notable book or comic made up one day, evidently by the page creator or someone connected to them. dalahäst (talk) 21:53, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - utterly non-notable fanfic. MikeWazowski (talk) 22:15, 4 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per G1 -- Google searches reveal nothing, likely hoax. --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 22:20, 4 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment — if I read the article correctly, there are no Google results because the work has yet to be written. It appears to be an idea for a story made up one day by the article creator (his username appears in the article as the name of a character) and his friends. dalahäst (talk) 22:29, 4 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete - Not notable.  NereusAJ ( T  |   C ) 23:17, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: Non-notable. SL93 (talk) 00:02, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 5 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - WP:SPIP yet claims nonexistent copyright protection and justification for plagarism. Worthy to be Salted. Jun Kayama 03:49, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete and SALT. From what I can see, this is pretty much the equivalent of a fanfic. They stated that they based it off of Highschool of the Dead, just changing the characters around enough to where they're saying they're "original" creations that they can copyright. I agree that this should be salted. This is honestly something that should have been speedy deleted from the start.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:01, 5 January 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.