Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fursonas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep, the merge notice is already on the article and whoever wants to can merge it at their convenience. - Bobet 13:19, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Fursonas
When I came across it, it had a suggestion to merge to furry fandom and people sounded like they agreed on this in the talk page. There also was a tag for original research. The article has NO SOURCES WHATSOEVER. It is an obvious neologism. Beralighthand 14:19, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge as above, though I disagree that this is a neologism. It gets 84,500 Google hits and Google Groups shows it in use going back at least to 1996. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:26, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge I've added 3 published usages (one of which has a definition) to the article as well as an information site that defines the term. Its also used extensively on numerous commercial art sites. The definition is easily found via google and consistent. Not at all original research.--Crossmr 16:38, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge into the Furry fandom article per above. Yamaguchi先生 22:38, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nonsense. --HResearcher 02:41, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.