Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Furtado Equation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-11 09:30Z 

Furtado Equation

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article, and the two related ones created by the same user, may not be patent nonsense to a general editor, so I didn't flag for speedy. But I think they are all patent nonsense to any physicist. I'd appreciate feedback on whether I've done this right, it's my first time on AfD. Philip Trueman 11:01, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:13, 7 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom as NN, violates WP:V. Only 34 G-hits  for the alleged creator, and the only ones of those referencing academia is of a similarly-named Brazilian music professor.  RGTraynor 15:19, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - this is definitely, definitely nonsense, not to mention totally non-notable. --Haemo 00:08, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * delete - per sidewalk cha- i mean per nom. Smmurphy(Talk) 02:21, 11 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.