Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Further Adventures in Babysitting (2016 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Adventures in Babysitting. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 08:56, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Further Adventures in Babysitting (2016 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not a film yet and not in production. Premature according to guidelines. Legacypac (talk) 05:56, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  10:20, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  10:20, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  10:20, 11 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - If filming hasen't begun yet then what's the point of the article ?, No evidence of notability Fails GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 17:16, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Adventures in Babysitting per MQS - Seems more logical to redirect as opposed to deletion, (Thanks MQS!). – Davey 2010 Talk 02:54, 16 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete or Redirect. If filming hasn't started yet, it's WP:TOOSOON. Egsan Bacon (talk) 15:22, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirecting per would also be fine, so I've adjusted my !vote above to include it. Egsan Bacon (talk) 16:24, 20 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect is okay by me. (I voted "Keep", before, have just revised this. ) Meets wp:GNG.  Use Google search link above for news, but drop the "(2016 film)" so you just search on "Further Adventures in Babysitting".  Multiple hits in reliable sources, including this Hollywood Reporter article of January 2015.  GNG trumps rule-of-thumb guideline that films generally meet Wikipedia notability when principal filming commences. -- do  ncr  am  14:57, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * So should it be moved at least to drop the (2016 film) part of title? Legacypac (talk) 20:05, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Sure, it cold be moved after a close to Further Adventures in Babysitting per WP:NCF.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 02:33, 16 January 2015 (UTC)




 * Redirect for now to Adventures in Babysitting per WP:NFF as simply being TOO SOON. Allow recreation or undeletion once principle filming is confirmed. This temporary redirect is per policy and guidline. What say,, , , ?  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 02:46, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Sounds good, redirect it. The (2016 film) part should be dropped too, so maybe move it to Further Adventures in Babysitting and then redirect it to the Remake section. Legacypac (talk) 05:43, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Will do... if we get a consensus for redirect.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 05:45, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 09:19, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect per MichaelQSchmidt. Definitely TOOSOON, but unlike many Disney projects which get a page before the casting sheet goes out thanks to the crufters, I fully expect this telefilm to get on the air thanks to the existing sourcing; we can break it out once we get casting/BTS/scheduling specifics, and we don't need the (2016) tag at all.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 16:52, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - I am okay with redirecting, have changed my "vote" above. Keeping would be okay too. -- do  ncr  am  01:30, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.