Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Further Products


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  So Why  17:07, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Further Products

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

absurd advertisement. 10,000 products? refs are pre pr, as would be expected.  DGG ( talk ) 09:15, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:36, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:36, 30 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment – Hi : As a comparison, would you consider the Ford Motor Company article to be an "absurd advertisement" too? After all, it has a Sales numbers section listing sales revenues from 1997 to 2016, and also includes sections about Sponsorships and Financial results, the latter with similar information, such as "Ford sold 528,349 F-Series trucks during the year, a 27.7% increase over 2009, out of a total sales of 1.9 million vehicles". Is this absurd too? Why or why not? Of note is that it is important for articles to include a claim of significance. North America1000 12:24, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
 * see WP:EINSTEIN DGG ( talk ) 22:48, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
 * It is important for articles to include a claim of significance; see WP:A7, which is not an essay. North America1000 22:58, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

 References
 * Keep Comment – Meets WP:GNG and WP:AUD per national-level coverage in reliable sources. North America1000 12:29, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Stephens, Jordan. "Taking it Further". Edible LA.
 * Stephens, Jordan. "Taking it Further". Edible LA.
 * Stephens, Jordan. "Taking it Further". Edible LA.
 * Stephens, Jordan. "Taking it Further". Edible LA.
 * Stephens, Jordan. "Taking it Further". Edible LA.
 * Stephens, Jordan. "Taking it Further". Edible LA.
 * Modified my !vote above to a comment. North America1000 20:07, 13 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as I looked at the sources above and they're simply rehashed press releases or notices, see:
 * "soap went on sale in December", "also sell Further to....restaurants owners....", "Dostal use biodiesel on his car", "Twice a month, he'd stop by", "[His wife]....and encouraged her husband", "Production moved from the lab...to a lab....extra-foamy soap....", "Marshall Dostal....taking another step to create Further soap", "He had an explosive problem, he was using the fuel....he would get the grease....turn his waste into by....taking the next level", "He created Further...."I wanted to create a company...., he said....[he] sent his childhood [with] chickens and shoveling coal....[He] extends....gratitude to his family....He and his wife used....[He] and his wife decided to....a fragrance blender....", "Further....give the soap a crisp and clean smell....[He] paired with Mario Batali...."' "gourmet grease...make new Further candles", "[He] hopes the....business model....will expand"
 * That there was from several of the sources above and they all shared the same PR-basis, and the man's own words were on every paragraph, so the conclusion is that he was behind the "facts", and facts alone cannot satisfy WP:N, since we're WP:Not a newspaper (policy). This is all primary information and cannot satisfy WP:GNG and its audience is not relevant here, since that in fact says we would need still 'independent reliable coverage and the quotes here are clearly not that. WP:NOT is clear in saying listings of business alliances, clients, competitors, employees (except CEOs, supervisory directors and similar top functionaries), equipment, estates, offices, products and services, sponsors and that's no different here at all, since the nomination's "advertisement" statement compliments this relevant policy. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 17:51, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  17:08, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete- I agree with Zppix's evaluation of the sources, and also cannot find anything better. Reyk  YO!  06:02, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree also, fails GNG. References fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing ++ 19:58, 13 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.