Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Futaba (H-anime)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Valley2 city ‽ 03:30, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Futaba (H-anime)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability Maniamin (talk) 22:50, 11 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Forget notability (WP:JNN is not a valid reason for deletion), I can't find any evidence that such an anime (or manga) actually exists. It may be just a lack of information in the article as it currently stands.  So FOR NOW I'd say delete on the basis of WP:V.  159.182.1.4 (talk) 12:08, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I find Futabu manga listed, as well as Futaba Kun Change Manga, when I google around. Does anyone know the Japanese name of this series?   D r e a m Focus  12:13, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, I found Futaba-Kun Change! of course, did some copypasta on the hiragani and tried searching for "ふたば," but... I think if we knew the author's name we'd have a MUCH better chance of finding... something. 159.182.1.4 (talk) 12:23, 12 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep per Dream Focus and notability jbolden1517Talk 06:11, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * What notability? No one has even proven it exists! -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 13:44, 12 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as a probably hoax. Completely unverifiable, failing WP:V and obviously failing WP:N. Can't be shown to be notable if it can't even be proven its real. Only Google results matching it are this article. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 13:44, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -- --  Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 13:44, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete. No Google hits other than the article itself.  The subject probably doesn't exist to begin with, let alone being notable.  Article content is a questionable list of (made-up?) characters and their unverifiable statistics (ejaculation volume, etc.), taken from no listed source.  Take the OR contents away, and nothing remains, but the title and lack of references.  This is a travesty.  Out with it. Freederick (talk) 14:26, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Possibly a hoax, possibly confusion with something else, useless in any event. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire - past ops) 15:51, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails a basic verifiability check. A Google search using the title and the main character's name and excluding Futaba-Kun Change! to avoid false positives did not come up with a single hit to suggest that this manga even exists. It's possible this is a dōjinshi (self-published/amateur comic), which wouldn't be notable in the first place. --Farix (Talk) 20:56, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete That's probabably an hoax as i failed to find proofs of existence. Scanlation, fansub, download websites don't even mention it. The Afd nominator should be warned that just writing a laconic notability to motivate an Afd won't do in his/her future nominations. --KrebMarkt 13:54, 14 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.