Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future Cut (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 02:24, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Future Cut
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doubtful notability, are the cites from reliable sources? Roger (talk) 07:33, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment: there are some undoubtedly reliable sources found by SwisterTwister in the first AfD, the question is whether there's sufficient depth. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:43, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:57, 8 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete The depth of coverage does not meet WP:NM. Dusty |&#x1f4ac;|You can help! 18:08, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment from an WP:AFC reviewer: See the AFC comments in this edit immediately prior to the post-move AFC cleanup.  In particular, Articles for deletion/Future Cut would have closed as "no consensus" with a 2-1 !vote of "keep," except that a COPYVIO was found at http://ben-hopkins.com/2012/08/14/future-cut-biog/ .  I did a quick check during AFC review to see if the current article was a COPYVIO and was unable to find any copyright problems.  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  22:58, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 00:45, 17 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete I'm not satisfied that we have any good criteria to judge technical people in this field, but the article is quite promotional, with repeated wording of "particularly for" and its synonyms.  DGG ( talk ) 00:59, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.