Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future Lovers/I Feel Love


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete as an apparently non-notable song. -- jonny - m t  14:32, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Future Lovers/I Feel Love

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A promotional, radio-only CD release in a small portion of the world, of what is little more than an album track, is not worthy of it's own article, even if it is by Madonna Paul75 (talk) 23:54, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:06, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. It seems to have gotten a lot of attention. Ilike.com BBC SoundIndex review and loads and loads of video and lyrics sites. Of course I'm not an expert on what makes notability in this area. --GRuban (talk) 20:48, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
 * N.B. Two of the websites mentioned above refer to the Future Lovers song, not the mash-up live track this article is concerned with Paul75 (talk) 17:54, 13 August 2008 (UTC)


 * KEEP it was released as a promotional single, has a music video and was used on the Confessions Tour in both the show and CD/DVD release. This makes it a worthy article.  J W A D  (talk)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, lifebaka++ 12:48, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, fails notability per WP:MUSIC. All the ref's provided prove the song exists, none show why it is notable. Propose delete over redirect as the article name is a non-plausible search term.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 14:19, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, no reliable sources. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 02:50, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - trivial coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 11:31, 18 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.