Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future Noir: The Making of Blade Runner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:45, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Future Noir: The Making of Blade Runner
Although an authoritative source on the making of Blade Runner it is not itself historically notable, and short of writing a book review there is not a lot to be said in the article that isn't already said in just two lines. Cain Mosni 00:11, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable. Amazon sales rank is #215,918. Aplomado  talk 00:18, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: Not notable. Rohirok 03:09, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable book. --Core des at talk. ^_^ 07:12, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn stub. Brisv e  gas  07:46, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Blade Runner. Great book, but such an article is doomed to eternal stubness. - Mgm|(talk) 11:22, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect Actually, yes, I can go with that. Specifically a redirect to the Bladerunner references section.  Cain Mosni 12:04, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and simply add ISBN to References section of Blade Runner ... remove it from "Making ofs" in Template:Bladerunner (along with the others that are already redlinked), and there's no need for a redirect. --Dennette 02:52, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Everything listed in "What links here" comes from the template ... delete it there, and no Redirect is needed. --Dennette 07:26, 3 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Per above. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 04:21, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Heimstern Läufer 22:36, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. Don't delete published books, especially books from a Harper Collins Publishers imprint. --badlydrawnjeff talk 23:51, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete (including mention on Balde Runner template) or redirect to Blade Runner. The fact that the book is published by Harper Collins doesn't mean that it deserves its own encyclopedia page. Zaxem 04:40, 3 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.