Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future Shock (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:45, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Future Shock (band)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Well, I'll give them credit for at least being on bluelink labels, but a.) one of said labels is at afd., and b.) I can't find any sources for any of this. Seems to fail WP:MUSIC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 14:03, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   --  Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 14:16, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:NMG. Stifle (talk) 16:12, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete One more full original release on Brainstorm and they might make it. until then, delete. Duffbeerforme (talk) 19:52, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Tending towards Keep - a quick Google search found significant coverage, plus they have enough releases on significant labels.--Michig (talk) 20:15, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * If Syntax is shown to be an important independant label as per WP:MUSIC and/or crossrhythms and www.rapreviews.com are reliable sources I will remove my previous position. Duffbeerforme (talk) 20:42, 17 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.