Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future Veneto


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Autonomists for Europe. Liz Read! Talk! 04:28, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Future Veneto

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Tiny unknown party and existed for a very short time, totally absent in the sources. Page written in a few lines, in practice the party existed and nothing else. It doesn't meet WP:GNG. Scia Della Cometa (talk) 11:10, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics,  and Italy. Shellwood (talk) 11:14, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete agree with nom, it existed for a brief time with nothing since for sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 14:46, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. The party was represented in Parliament for two years by a senator, its leader Giuseppe Ceccato, and a handful of deputies. We should avoid recentism: this party was relevant enough to have an article in Wikipedia, is mentioned in several sources, including the book cited in the article and in a several articles of Corriere della Sera (most notably 18 July 1999, 25 August 1999 and 2 February 2001) and, of course, in dozen of articles of regional newspapers like Il Gazzettino or Il Giornale di Vicenza. While the party is quite old, there are still more than 100 Google hits for "veneto futuro" + "ceccato". As I said, we should avoid recentism. This said, if there is no consensus on keeping the article, I hope we can at least merge it into Autonomists for Europe in order to preserve the article's history. --Checco (talk) 18:40, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I look at the Google Hits link here above (motivation for keeping which would be preferable to avoid) and I see that most of the sites that mention it have are linked to Wikipedia: you should also check the content of Google hits before mentioning it as a reason for maintenance. However I can agree to merge it with Autonomists for Europe. --Scia Della Cometa (talk) 19:47, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Relisting comment: The discussion is slightly leaning toward a merge, with the nominator stating later in the discussion that a merge would be functional. However, overall input here is rather sparse, and is still divergent; more opinions are needed for a solid consensus to be ascertained. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:38, 21 August 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 18:47, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Autonomists for Europe as this party is not a party on its own, but just the Veneto regional section of ApE. Yakme (talk) 20:30, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Merge and redirect to whichever article is more apropriate. Handmeanotherbagofthemchips (talk) 22:59, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm leaning to delete this voice, because this party cannot be found in any reliable sources. However, looking at the other comments in this AfD, as alternative, I'd propose to redirect to Autonomists for Europe. P1221 (talk) 09:44, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete totally agree with nom. --多少 战场 龙 (talk) 14:03, 2 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.